1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1956 Talbot 2500
To start off, 1956 Talbot 2500 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1956 Talbot 2500. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1956 Talbot 2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 820 kg more than 1956 Talbot 2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1956 Talbot 2500 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
| Model | 60 | 2500 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2510 mm |
