1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 60 | SL |
Year Released | 1942 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2410 mm |