1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1969 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1969 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 60 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 4731 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2750 mm |
