1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 1972 Rover 3.5 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover 3.5 (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover 3.5 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 Rover 3.5 has automatic transmission and 1942 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1942 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rover 3.5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | 60 | 3.5 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2820 mm |
