1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1973 Fiat 130
To start off, 1973 Fiat 130 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Fiat 130 (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Fiat 130 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1973 Fiat 130.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1973 Fiat 130 has automatic transmission and 1942 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1942 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Fiat 130 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 1973 Fiat 130 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 60 | 130 |
Year Released | 1942 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 3237 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2730 mm |