1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1973 Triumph 2000 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 572 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 60 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2700 mm |
