1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1978 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1978 Lancia Beta is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1978 Lancia Beta.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 1978 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | 60 | Beta |
Year Released | 1942 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2360 mm |