1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1983 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1983 Toyota Corolla is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Corolla. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 1983 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 60 | Corolla |
Year Released | 1942 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2410 mm |