1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1984 Volvo 360
To start off, 1984 Volvo 360 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1984 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1984 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 781 kg more than 1984 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1984 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 60 | 360 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1039 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2410 mm |
