1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1985 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1985 Caterham 1700 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1985 Caterham 1700. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1985 Caterham 1700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1277 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 1985 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | 60 | 1700 |
Year Released | 1942 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2240 mm |