1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 716 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 60 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1660 mm |
