1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 60 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 5012 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2750 mm |
