1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1988 Honda Integra
To start off, 1988 Honda Integra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1988 Honda Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1988 Honda Integra.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1942 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1942 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1988 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 60 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1665 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2450 mm |
