1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (130 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 60 | 323 |
Year Released | 1942 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2510 mm |