1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1993 Fiat Tempra
To start off, 1993 Fiat Tempra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1993 Fiat Tempra. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1993 Fiat Tempra.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1993 Fiat Tempra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 60 | Tempra |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2550 mm |
