1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 60 | 626 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2620 mm |
