1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1998 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 1998 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Saab 03-Sep (152 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1998 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 1998 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Cadillac | Saab |
Model | 60 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1942 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2610 mm |