1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1999 Fiat Palio
To start off, 1999 Fiat Palio is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1999 Fiat Palio. (69 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1999 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1999 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1999 Fiat Palio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 60 | Palio |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2610 mm |
