1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1999 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (232 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1999 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1999 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 60 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2840 mm |
