1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2000 Opel Astra
To start off, 2000 Opel Astra is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Astra (190 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Astra should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 445 kg more than 2000 Opel Astra.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2000 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | 60 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2620 mm |
