1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1320 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
| Model | 60 | 7 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 3110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2230 mm |
