1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 505 kg more than 1942 Cadillac 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 60 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 3510 mm |