1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2003 Isuzu Wizard
To start off, 2003 Isuzu Wizard is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu Wizard (202 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Wizard should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60.
Because 2003 Isuzu Wizard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Wizard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2003 Isuzu Wizard | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | 60 | Wizard |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 3163 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2710 mm |
