1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (390 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 318 kg more than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 60 | X-Type |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1502 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2720 mm |
