1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2003 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2003 Subaru Forester is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Forester. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2003 Subaru Forester. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2003 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | 60 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2530 mm |
