1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | 60 | Smart |
Year Released | 1942 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2370 mm |