1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2004 Rover 75.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | 60 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2750 mm |
