1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (213 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 183 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | 60 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1637 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2660 mm |
