1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 60 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2490 mm |
