1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 352 kg more than 2005 Saturn L.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2005 Saturn L | |
Make | Cadillac | Saturn |
Model | 60 | L |
Year Released | 1942 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1468 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2710 mm |