1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 835 kg more than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 60 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2790 mm |
