1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 60 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 4014 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2730 mm |
