1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (286 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 340 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 60 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1942 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2630 mm |