1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 45 kg more than 1942 Cadillac 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
| Model | 60 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2830 mm |
