1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 70 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 60 | Clio |
Year Released | 1942 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2580 mm |