1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 347 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | 60 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1811 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2634 mm |
