1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 5 kg more than 1942 Cadillac 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 60 | E |
Year Released | 1942 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4868 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2071 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2874 mm |