1942 Cadillac 61 vs. 1968 Rover 2000
To start off, 1968 Rover 2000 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Rover 2000 (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 61. (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 61. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1968 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 61 | 1968 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | 61 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5274 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1330 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2640 mm |
