1942 Cadillac 61 vs. 1998 Zagato Zuma
To start off, 1998 Zagato Zuma is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 61 (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1998 Zagato Zuma. (108 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 1998 Zagato Zuma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1998 Zagato Zuma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 61 | 1998 Zagato Zuma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zagato |
| Model | 61 | Zuma |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5274 cc | 1894 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2520 mm |
