1942 Cadillac 61 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Mustang (256 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 61. (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 61. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 418 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 61 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 61 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5274 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1482 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2580 mm |
