1942 Cadillac 61 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 61. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 61. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 61 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 61 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5274 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 141 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1850 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2990 mm |
