1942 Cadillac 61 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,274 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 61 (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 745 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 61 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 61 | 2 |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5274 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1155 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2500 mm |