1942 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1999 Lancia Zeta is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1999 Lancia Zeta.
Because 1942 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | 62 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2830 mm |
