1942 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2001 Skoda Fabia is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1942 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | 62 | Fabia |
Year Released | 1942 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2470 mm |