1942 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 696 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Dingo |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2450 mm |
