1942 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1942 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2690 mm |
