1942 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 275 kg more than 1942 Cadillac 62.
Because 1942 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Cadillac | Saab |
| Model | 62 | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 2141 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2680 mm |
