1942 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2010 Lotus Elise is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Elise weights approximately 15 kg more than 1942 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | 62 | Elise |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 433 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1881 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2941 mm |