1942 Citroen 7A vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Citroen 7A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Citroen 7A would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1942 Citroen 7A. (35 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1942 Citroen 7A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo C30 weights approximately 698 kg more than 1942 Citroen 7A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Citroen 7A | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 7A | C30 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1529 cc | 2520 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2650 mm |
