1942 Ford Taunus vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP) has 234 more horse power than 1942 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1942 Ford Taunus.
Because 1942 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1942 Ford Taunus has manual transmission. 1942 Ford Taunus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Ford Taunus | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Taunus | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2340 mm |
